| 
	
		| 
		
			|  | SoftTree Technologies Technical Support Forums
 |  |  
	
		| 
	
	
	
		| Author | Message |  
		| ELVERGON 
 
 
 
 
			
				| Joined: 27 Oct 2009 Posts: 1
 Country: Ecuador
 |  
 | 
			
				|  NAME_BASE..NAME_TABLE    ???? |   |  
				| No support sql asisstant example: NAME_BASE..NAME_TABLE ....?
 
 SHOULD PUT
 NAME.user.NAME_TABLE
 
 Saludos
 Hugo
 
  
 
 Last edited by ELVERGON on Sun Nov 15, 2009 11:13 pm; edited 1 time in total
 |  |  
		| Thu Oct 29, 2009 5:13 pm |     |  
		|  |  
		| SysOp Site Admin
 
 
 
 
			
				| Joined: 26 Nov 2006 Posts: 7990
 
 |  
 | 
			
				|   |   |  
				| Sorry, I don't understand your question. Can you offer a more specific example? 
 Are you asking about "Fully Qualify Object Name" option, by any chance?
 
 |  |  
		| Thu Oct 29, 2009 10:20 pm |     |  
		|  |  
		| SysOp Site Admin
 
 
 
 
			
				| Joined: 26 Nov 2006 Posts: 7990
 
 |  
 | 
			
				|   |   |  
				| Thanks for the screenshot. Now it is clear what you mean. 
 SQL Assistant  currently doesn't support schema-less "database_name..object_name" syntax.  The internal engine supports database_name.schema_name.object_name, schema_name.object_name, and object_name syntax, which is standard for all supported database systems.
 
 |  |  
		| Sun Nov 15, 2009 11:36 pm |     |  
		|  |  
		|  |  
  
	| 
 
 | You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum
 You cannot edit your posts in this forum
 You cannot delete your posts in this forum
 You cannot vote in polls in this forum
 
 |  |  |